Skip to main content
Now that you’re connected, you can start asking questions about the scientific tools SandboxAQ provides. A good first prompt is:
What tools do you have available from SandboxAQ?
The examples below are copy-paste ready prompts for exploring AQPotency (small-molecule potency, selectivity, and target scanning) and AQCat (catalysis and surface adsorption). Swap in your own SMILES, UniProt IDs, or surfaces as needed.

AQPotency prompts

Predict binding potency against a single target with AqpotencyPotency

Predict the binding potency of CC1=CC=C(C=C1)S(=O)(=O)N against protein P00533.

Scan a compound against a protein panel with AqpotencyScan

Scan CC1=CC=C(C=C1)S(=O)(=O)N against the human_kinome.

Assess selectivity against off-targets with AqpotencySelectivity

Assess the selectivity of CC1=CC=C(C=C1)S(=O)(=O)N against target Q15078 vs. off-targets Q6J9G0, Q13546, Q15768.

Rank a focused library with AqpotencyScreen

I have a focused library of ~1,000 compounds. Upload the file, then use the AqpotencyScreen tool to rank the top 25 compounds by predicted potency against UniProt P00533 (EGFR) so I can shortlist them for docking. Include ligand_similarity and protein_in_training on each row.
Download Example CSV

Profile a series with AqpotencySelectivity

For the SMILES below, use the AqpotencySelectivity tool with target_uniprot_id='P50613' (CDK7) and off_target_uniprot_ids=['P06493','P24941','P11802','Q00534','P50750'] (CDK1, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, CDK9). Return per-off-target fold selectivity and the strongest-off-target summary.

AQCat prompts

Each prompt below is documented in full — with the parameters your client sends and representative output — on the AQCat Adsorption Spin page.

Find the lowest-energy adsorption configuration

Use the AQCat tool to find the lowest-binding-energy configuration for N₂ adsorbed on a cobalt-nickel (111) surface. Report the binding energy of the winning placement and confirm whether the relaxation converged.

CO oxidation on Cu(110)

For a CO oxidation catalysis study, use the AQCat tool to find the most favorable adsorption configuration for CO on a copper (110) surface. Report the binding energy of the winning placement and how many placements relaxed to convergence.

Compare H adsorption across Fe facets

For a hydrogen evolution research question, use the AQCat tool to compare atomic hydrogen (H) adsorption across three iron surfaces — Fe (100), Fe (110), and Fe (111). Make one AQCat call per facet, then report the binding energy and convergence status for each, and identify which facet binds H most strongly.

Rank a copper alloy series by CO binding energy

For a CO oxidation screen, use the AQCat tool to rank four copper-based compositions — Cu, Cu-Zn, Cu-Ni, and Cu-Pd — by CO binding energy on the (111) facet. Make one AQCat call per composition, then report the binding energy and convergence status for each and rank them from strongest to weakest binding.

Check whether spin polarization applies

Use the AQCat tool to compute the binding energy of atomic nitrogen (N) on an iron (110) surface and on a platinum (111) surface. Report the is_spin_off flag for each alongside the binding energy, and tell me whether the two results can be compared to each other.